An anonymous Substack post printed this week accuses compliance startup Delve of “falsely” convincing “lots of of consumers they have been compliant” with privateness and safety rules, probably exposing these clients to “felony legal responsibility beneath HIPAA and hefty fines beneath GDPR.”
Delve is a Y Combinator-backed startup that final 12 months announced raising a $32 million Series A at a $300 million valuation. (The spherical was led by Perception Companions.) On Friday, the startup tried to refute the accusations with on its blog, calling the Substack submit “deceptive” and saying it “comprises plenty of inaccurate claims.”
The Substack submit is credited to “DeepDelver,” who described themselves as working at a (now former) Delve consumer.
DeepDelver recounted receiving an e mail in December claiming the startup had “leaked a spreadsheet with confidential consumer experiences.” Whereas Delve CEO Karun Kaushik apparently assured clients in a subsequent e mail that they have been in compliance and that no exterior celebration gained entry to delicate information, DeepDelver stated they and different clients had turn out to be suspicious.
“Having the shared expertise of being underwhelmed with the Delve expertise, and having the general sense that one thing fishy was occurring, we determined to pool sources and examine collectively,” they wrote.
Their conclusion? That Delve “achieves its declare of being the quickest platform by producing pretend proof, producing auditor conclusions on behalf of certification mills that rubber stamp experiences, and skipping main framework necessities whereas telling purchasers they’ve achieved 100% compliance.”
DeepDelver went into appreciable element about these claims, accusing the startup of offering clients with “fabricated proof of board conferences, assessments, and processes that by no means occurred,” then forcing these clients to “select between adopting pretend proof or performing largely handbook work with little actual automation or AI.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
DeepDelver additionally claimed that nearly all of Delve’s purchasers appear to have gone by way of two audit corporations, Accorp and Gradient, which they described as “a part of the identical operation,” one which operates primarily in India, with solely a nominal presence in the USA.
These corporations, they stated, are simply rubber-stamping experiences that have been generated by Delve. Because of this, DeepDelver stated the startup “inverts” the conventional compliance construction: “By producing auditor conclusions, take a look at procedures, and ultimate experiences earlier than any unbiased assessment happens, Delve locations itself within the function of each implementer and examiner. This isn’t a technicality. It’s a structural fraud that invalidates the whole attestation.”
Along with accusing Delve of deceptive its clients, DeepDelver stated the startup helps these clients “mislead the general public by internet hosting belief pages that comprise safety measures that have been by no means carried out.”
As for its personal relationship with Delve, DeepDelver stated their firm has unpublished its belief web page and not depends on the startup for compliance.
Delve responded to the accusations by saying it doesn’t problem compliance experiences in any respect. As a substitute, it’s an “automation platform” that ingests details about compliance, then supplies auditors with entry to that data.
“Remaining experiences and opinions are issued solely by unbiased, licensed auditors, not Delve,” the corporate stated.
Delve additionally stated that its clients “can decide to work with an auditor of their selecting or decide to work with one from Delve’s community of unbiased, accredited third-party audit corporations.” These corporations, the startup stated, are “established corporations used broadly throughout the business, together with by different compliance platforms.”
In response to the accusation that it’s offering clients with “pretend proof,” Delve countered that it’s merely providing “templates to assist groups doc their processes in accordance with compliance necessities, as do different compliance platforms.”
“Draft templates are usually not the identical as ‘pre-filled proof,” the corporate stated.
Delve added that it’s “actively investigating any leaks” and is “nonetheless reviewing the Substack.”
TechCrunch despatched an e mail looking for further remark to the media contact tackle listed on Delve’s web site; the e-mail bounced. We’ve got additionally reached out to DeepDelver for extra remark.
